Yes, Throw the Celebrity Clowns Away

My current mood is toward throwing everything in the political realm away, including anyone calling themselves a leftist, but we can start with celebrities. The selection of videos at the end of this post is great.


Regular readers will know that one of the most unfair and purist things I do on this blog is to quote people like John Oliver and Jon Stewart accurately when they say transparently power-serving things. It might be because I have a bad habit of waking up on the wrong side of the bed, or it may be because:

  • Their progressive reputations are entirely the result of savvy marketing, and these people are actually centrist or right-wing liberals, or worse (and this isn’t a matter of opinion, it’s a fact evidenced by the power-serving and reactionary things that they say).
  • Everything they tell their viewers about the world comes from their moderate-conservative politics, and their tepid, incrementalist “solutions” aren’t little stepping-stones on the path to progress, but are distractions that lead people towards elite-approved dead-ends (and it could only ever be this way because, as basic media literacy would dictate, they are the employees of corporations for whom…

View original post 1,875 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Manufacturing Normality

C. J. Hopkins in Counterpunch:

Sometime circa mid-November, in the wake of Hillary Clinton’s defeat (i.e., the beginning of the end of democracy), the self-appointed Guardians of Reality, better known as the corporate media, launched a worldwide marketing campaign against the evil and perfidious scourge of “fake news.” This campaign is now at a fever pitch. Media outlets throughout the empire are pumping out daily dire warnings of the imminent, existential threat to our freedom posed by the “fake news” menace. This isn’t just the dissemination of disinformation, propaganda, and so on, that’s been going on for thousands of years … Truth itself is under attack. The very foundations of Reality are shaking.

View original post.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Bury Jill Stein With Hillary Clinton

With reflection I’m starting to think this election has been terribly underrated. Not only did we see Hillary Clinton completely destroyed politically for all eternity, and thoroughly humiliated, she entertainingly coughed, siezedtripped and collapsed all the way to the surprise ending. She’s clearly in the grip of some serious, though delightfullly slapstick-inducing health problem that we can happily trust will get worse, especially now that her spirit is irretrievably crushed.

Green Party prez candidate Jill Stein seems entirely free of entertaining health problems, but I am getting a giddy suspicion that at least her political death is at hand and that she may take the Greens with her. Watching her disgustingly reactionary and partisan appeal for a recount makes me realize I have been far too easy on third parties, when it’s painfully obvious they’re just a heat sink for lefties too woke for the  Democrats. Since the Democratic Party is no longer taken seriously by anyone who isn’t a complete waste of oxygen, let’s go scorched earth on all its enablers, starting with riff raff like Stein.

I’m lazy so I am grateful that Stein has, in the past week or so, made the case for burying her next to Hillary all by herself. It’s really rather sad — well, no, more like repulsive and sickening — to watch people offer 11 dimensional chess theories to explain Stein’s striking resemblance of late to the worst DNC offal.  Why are people so desperate for famous allies that they tell themselves stupid stories to avoid the obvious? Grow up, you big babies. The sooner you realize you have only enemies in high places, the better off we’ll all be.

Look at this petition Stein provided to Wisconsin. Featuring talking points about nefarious “foreign operators” — looking at you, Vlad! — breaching voter databases and — horrors — infiltrating the “email systems of the Democratic National Committee and a campaign official for Democratic Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton” it could have, and may well have, been written by a DNC staffer or one of its patrons. Most sickeningly, Stein cites the joint statement of the Department of Homeland Security and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which, without offering any evidence, intimated that the email breaches were an attempt by Russia “to interfere in the US election process.”

Stein includes the full joint statement from the Homeland Security web site among the petition’s exhibits, along with articles from Wired, the New York Times and the NBC Nightly News fingering Russia as the source of the DNC email hacks. Indeed, the email breach and other alleged breaches unrelated to voting machines make up Stein’s entire  “case” for the Wisconsin recount, which claims there were voting irregularities without stating what they were and is entirely bereft of any evidence there was tampering with the state’s voting machines themselves.

Stein’s Exhibit 1 is an affidavit from University of Michigan professor J. Alex Halderman who led the group of scientists that kicked off this effort when they called on Clinton to seek a recount in battleground states. His affidavit, like the petition to which it’s attached, provides no concrete evidence of vote irregularities or tampering, and builds its case on the email breaches and the alleged Russian hacking of Ukraine’s 2014 presidential election.

Even if Stein’s focus weren’t entirely on three states Clinton lost and even if her petitioning didn’t recapitulate evidence-free DNC scare-mongering about Russian interference, the recount campaign would still be some seriously shitty shit. Who can justify prolonging an election cycle that seemed endless months ago, with yet one more “transparency” spectacle that, by focusing on minor details, whitewashes systemic cancer.

Let’s recall that in 2012, Stein and her running mate that year, Cherie Honkala, were arrested and handcuffed to chairs for eight hours, when they attempted to enter the presidential debate site at Hofstra University.  Did that experience teach Stein nothing? Like that there may be better things for her to do in late 2016 than antfuck the “integrity” of a contest between two ruling class monsters, on behalf a thoroughly corrupt candidate that cheated her way to the nomination and threatened a military response to Russian cyberwarfare?

There are only two possibilities for what’s going on here. One is that Stein is a complete fraud and is simply running errands for a Clinton campaign concerned about the “optics” of seeking the recount on their own. The other is that Stein is pursuing some other agenda, and, with uncharacteristic pragmatism, framing the recount in a way that will attract maximum financial support for that agenda from Clinton’s supporters.

Since she has said surplus money raised for the recount will go toward “election integrity efforts and to promote voting system reform” there seems to be no potential outcome to redeem her partisan, russophobic clowning, and indeed, even Stein’s party has officially abstained from endorsing the project. The Green Party Steering Committee also laudably rejected her request that the Party open up a bank account to accommodate much larger single donations than finance rules permit for the Stein-Baraka campaign account.  Since the projected fees for Stein’s hand-picked attorney keep going up, it could be that Stein is simply in the can’t beat ’em join ’em phase of her political evolution and taking a cue from the peerlessly self-dealing candidate on whose behalf she’s now making an ass of herself.

Whatever her game is, it’s been a financial boondoggle. On the first day of fundraising, donations poured in at a rate of over $125,000 per hour and the total haul is now around 5 million. This hardly seems like the kind of grass roots, small donor effort Stein’s crunchy brand sits well with. Of course Stein can’t possibly know where all this money is coming from, but that hasn’t kept her  from sneering at George Soros theories, with characteristic witlessness. Since this kind of sneering is fast becoming the calling card of the professionally duplicitous, like risibly phony “communist” Taryn Fivek and the anti-Russian “fake news” clowns, it’s one more reason to conclude Stein is a pernicious charlatan that will, with any luck, soon self-destruct.


Now Stein’s running mate, Ajamu Baraka, has come out against the recount. Via walterglass4.


In the interest of fairness, I offer this just-discovered defense of the recount from Bruce Dixon of Black Agenda Report. I respect Dixon, and no doubt a lot of my readers do too, but this is an evasive, entirely unpersuasive one-noter about voter disenfranchisement that entirely ignores the russophobic, DNC stench of Stein’s appeal; the exclusive focus on battleground states in which Clinton lost; and the undemocratic way in which Stein is going about her campaign in relation to her party.  Disappointing to see Dixon on this bandwagon.


Via our pal nosoyyo, here’s a statement by prominent Greens, posted today (November 28) on the Margaret Flowers for Senate repudiating Stein’s recount campaign:

There are significant electoral reforms needed to make elections more democratic and more representative of the people. While we support electoral reforms, including how the vote is counted, we do not support the current recount being undertaken by Jill Stein.

The decision to pursue a recount was not made in a democratic or a strategic way, nor did it respect the established decision making processes and structures of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS).  The recount has created confusion about the relationship between the Green and Democratic parties because the states chosen for the recount are only states in which Hillary Clinton lost. There were close races in other states such as New Hampshire and Minnesota where Clinton won, but which were not part of the recount. And this recount does not address the disenfranchisement of voters; it recounts votes that were already counted rather than restoring the suffrage of voters who were prevented from voting.

As a candidate, Dr. Stein has the right to call for a recount. However, we urge the GPUS to distance itself from any appearance of support for either Democrats or Republicans. We are well aware of the undemocratic actions taken during the primaries by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Greens cannot be perceived to be allied with such a party.

Read the full statement.



Posted in Uncategorized | 55 Comments

The Mysterious Case Of Jill Stein’s Surging Recount Costs

Zero Hedge via Arthur Silber:

Just yesterday we noted that Jill Stein was acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton to raise money for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.  As we noted then, we continue to be astonished by the amount of money flowing into the fundraising campaign and would love to see which of Hillary’s mega donors have spent the most on the effort…somehow we suspect this isn’t just a “grassroots organizing” effort as Stein described it.

So, in less than 1 day, Jill Stein raised over $3mm, which is more than the $2mm needed to force a recount in Wisconsin.  While she attributed the accomplishment to “the power of grassroots organizing,” we would tend to be a little more skeptical and would love to see exactly where those donations came from.  Then again, maybe we’re wrong and there really are just that many disaffected snowflakes out there willing to blow their money on an extreme long shot.


View original post.

Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

The List (USA!USA!)



An Initial Set of Sites That Reliably Echo USA!USA! Propaganda

We have used a combination of structural analysis and critical reading, including analysis of content, timing, technical indicators, and other reporting, in order to initially identify (“spangle-flag”) the following as USA!USA! propaganda outlets. We then confirmed our initial assessment by applying whatever criteria we did not originally employ during the spangle-flag process, and we reevaluate our findings as needed.

Please note that our criteria is based on which sites paint empire as the good guy in a world full of bad actors. That means the characteristics of the propaganda outlets we identify are managed. For purposes of this definition it does not matter whether the sites listed here are being knowingly directed and paid by USA!USA! intelligence officers, or whether they even knew they were echoing USA!USA! propaganda at any particular point: If they meet these criteria, they are at…

View original post 204 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

If Putin Did Rig the US Election: Good

100 Flamingos

6ddc93b8-ebda-49f4-a1e9-5b8d878f9ae9-1394-000002d18293cd32_tmpFirst, liberals laughed at the idea that the election could be rigged. And since this is a woke blog yes of course every election is a sham meant to allow the plebs to let off steam while the real decisions are made far above the pay grade of mere mortals. But some embraced the idea that certain, eh, corrections were necessary to achieve the correct result. One commentator on my Facebook, during the dying embers of the Bernie battle after Clinton was anointed, said yes, this is what Our Party does — they assure results that will give us the most electable nominee. Of course, her personal, professional, lettered, Brooklyned self naturally thought Julia Caesar more electable than someone who was obviously warm and passionate and approachable and likeable as a human being in exactly the same way people said about George W. Bush — despite the fact that she was…

View original post 887 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Comments

Paying to Play in the Strategy of Contention

100 Flamingos

My but how quickly liberal political correctness is jettisoned when the sweet-talking wing of the fascist party doesn’t get its way! By which I mean to say, loses. LOSES! I cannot contain my glee but then I’ve never pretended to be anything but that which I am: a very vindictive, schadenfreude-driven self-ordained spokesperson for the proletariat. The kind which it may now be polite in liberal circles to call an effete bitchy little faggot. I’ll take it with a pirouette.

You may have heard the most recent Trump-era outrages — NODAPL protesters doused with water in frigid temperatures despite, well, Obama still being president and in favor of the pipeline. Oh wait that’s not it. Oh it’s this scary bunch of waddling brownshirts seig-heiling the new Fuhrer. No that’s not it either. Oh yes! It’s the daughter of president-elect Trump and new chief of his businesses Ivanka Trump being given…

View original post 559 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments